Why We Should Not
Bomb Afghanistan
NOTE: I am going to ask you
to read this all the way through before you flame off. For the first few days
after the attack all *I* wanted to do was to be the one to push 'the button.'
That was this old wounded dragon rearing her injured head. For days my friends
in the Intelligence community let me rant. And then one of the quietest of this
elite group took me by the hand and made me listen to him. What he impressed
upon me is the fact the ever since the Taliban took over that millions and
millions of people have suffered, many unto death. Women are now denied basic
health care. Children are without food or shelter. Many, many die.
Please take a minute of your time to read this letter. I believe that
we must destroy the Taliban and it's insane leader Osama Bin Laden. Killing
those who cannot stand up for themselves is not what we are about. No matter
what, we are still the protectors of those who are oppressed. That includes
those who cannot protect themselves from these monsters. I believe that our
duty lies, not in the path of least resistance, but on the path that will free
these people, and the world from a evil too great for words.
As we begin
to call up our brothers and sisters, our mothers and fathers, our sons and
daughters to fight this war, we must accept that there is only one right way to
do this. May our Gods and Goddess's protect us and give our leaders the
strength to do what is right.
Mary
Dear Gary and whoever
else is on this email thread:
I've been hearing a lot of talk about
"bombing Afghanistan back to the Stone Age." Ronn Owens, on KGO Talk Radio
today, allowed that this would mean killing innocent people, people who had
nothing to do with this atrocity, but "we're at war, we have to accept
collateral damage. What else can we do?" Minutes later I heard some TV pundit
discussing whether we "have the belly to do what must be done."
And I
thought about the issues being raised especially hard because I am from
Afghanistan, and even though I've lived here for 35 years I've never lost track
of what's going on there. So I want to tell anyone who will listen how it all
looks from where I'm standing.
I speak as one who hates the Taliban and
Osama Bin Laden. There is no doubt in my mind that these people were
responsible for the atrocity in New York. I agree that something must be done
about those monsters.
But the Taliban and Bin Laden are not
Afghanistan. They're not even the government of Afghanistan. The Taliban are a
cult of ignorant psychotics who took over Afghanistan in 1997. Bin Laden is a
political criminal with a plan. When you think Taliban, think Nazis. When you
think Bin Laden, think Hitler. And when you think "the people of Afghanistan"
think "the Jews in the concentration camps." It's not only that the Afghan
people had nothing to do with this atrocity. They were the first victims of the
perpetrators. They would exult if someone would come in there, take out the
Taliban and clear out the rats nest of international thugs holed up in their
country.
Some say, why don't the Afghans rise up and overthrow the
Taliban? The answer is, they're starved, exhausted, hurt, incapacitated,
suffering. A few years ago, the United Nations estimated that there are 500,000
disabled orphans in Afghanistan--a country with no economy, no food. There are
millions of widows. And the Taliban has been burying these widows alive in mass
graves. The soil is littered with land mines, the farms were all destroyed by
the Soviets. These are a few of the reasons why the Afghan people have not
overthrown the Taliban.
We come now to the question of bombing
Afghanistan back to the Stone Age. Trouble is, that's been done. The Soviets
took care of it already. Make the Afghans suffer? They're already suffering.
Level their houses? Done. Turn their schools into piles of rubble? Done.
Eradicate their hospitals? Done. Destroy their infrastructure? Cut them off
from medicine and health care? Too late. It's already been done.
New
bombs would only stir the rubble of earlier bombs. Would they at least get the
Taliban? Not likely. In today's Afghanistan, only the Taliban eat, only they
have the means to move around. They'd slip away and hide. Maybe the bombs would
get some of those disabled orphans--they don't move too fast, they don't even
have wheelchairs. But flying over Kabul and dropping bombs wouldn't really be a
strike against the criminals who did this horrific thing. Actually it would
only be making common cause with the Taliban--by raping once again the people
they've been raping all this time.
So what else is there? What can be
done, then? Let me now speak with true fear and trembling. The only way to get
Bin Laden is to go in there with ground troops. When people speak of "having
the belly to do what needs to be done" they're thinking in terms of having the
belly to kill as many as needed. Having the belly to overcome any moral qualms
about killing innocent people. Let's pull our heads out of the sand. What's
actually on the table is Americans dying. And not just because some Americans
would die fighting their way through Afghanistan to Bin Laden's hideout. It's
much bigger than that folks. Because to get any troops to Afghanistan, we'd
have to go through Pakistan. Would they let us? Not likely. The conquest of
Pakistan would have to be first. Will other Muslim nations just stand by? You
see where I'm going. We're flirting with a world war between Islam and the
West.
And guess what: that's Bin Laden's program. That's exactly what
he wants. That's why he did this. Read his speeches and statements. It's all
right there. He really believes Islam would beat the West. It might seem
ridiculous, but he figures if he can polarize the world into Islam and the
West, he's got a billion soldiers. If the West wreaks a holocaust in those
lands, that's a billion people with nothing left to lose, that's even better
from Bin Laden's point of view. He's probably wrong, in the end the West would
win, whatever that would mean, but the war would last for years and millions
would die, not just theirs but ours. Who has the belly for that? Bin Laden
does. Anyone else?
Tamim Ansary